Search Thermo Fisher Scientific
- Order Status
- Quick Order
-
Don't have an account ? Create Account
Search Thermo Fisher Scientific
Scientific research facilities account for a disproportionate amount of energy consumption and waste compared to other commercial buildings, according to Thermo Fisher Scientific’s Martina Franke.
As a former lab manager, Martina began her career with a specialisation in molecular biology before working as a medical researcher across a number of fields– immunology, biochemistry, protein and gene research.
After relocating to Australia, she took the lead setting up a new biomedical research lab in-situ. Starting from empty benches, she worked to get the lab up and running, meeting and exceeding compliance and regulations to the highest standards of practice.
Now in a role as Product Manager at Thermo Fisher, Martina assists customers with understanding lab management from an operations and facilities management perspective, which includes the careful planning, measuring and costing of a lab’s environmental impact.
“The detrimental environmental impact of unsustainable laboratory practices contributes to rising sea levels, global warming, reduced biodiversity and changes in local ecology and disease patterns,” says Martina.
“From an environmental perspective, scientific research facilities trump other commercial buildings due to the volume of waste they output from lab consumables, cold storage facilities, and ventilation systems– all of which are used to ensure sterile and temperate conditions for performing scientific work,” she explains.
“From an operations management perspective, a lab’s environmental impact can be assessed based on its waste management processes and the natural resources it expends, but there is also the financial impact for lab managers to consider. For example: What does it actually cost a business to implement more sustainable products and processes?”
As pressure mounts on the scientific community to offset their environmental impact, labs are being encouraged to demonstrate that they are purposeful in their sustainability efforts.
And yet– many organisations still believe that implementing sustainability in the lab will compromise important scientific work.
“By taking a fresh look at how labs operate from the top-down, Thermo Fisher has been looking for ways to incorporate green chemistry and green engineering principles, products, and processes, cost-effectively to help labs reduce waste, improve energy efficiency, and conserve resources,” says Martina.
“But endeavouring to tackle sustainability issues within the lab means that lab managers must become responsible for helping their employees understand their individual impact and their organisation’s larger footprint.”
Given that sustainability in the lab is a relatively new concept that lacks established guidelines from trusted parties, Thermo Fisher Scientific’s Green Team has taken the lead on developing valuable resources for labs who want to implement more sustainable, cost-effective, products and practices right now.
The following tips contain easy-to-follow steps based on Thermo Fisher’s key sustainability criteria that will enable labs to start making greener choices now and take steps toward a healthier, cleaner and safer future.
The journey to making sustainability in the lab a reality starts today with Thermo Fisher Scientific. For an easy-to-follow, handy tips checklist that can be posted above a workbench, Thermo Fisher Scientific has created a sustainability in the lab companion checklist ‘A year of sustainability in the lab’– which highlights daily, monthly, and annual green actions for labs to follow.
Download checklist Learn more about sustainability in the lab