Search Thermo Fisher Scientific
- Contact Us
- Quick Order
-
Don't have an account ? Create Account
Search Thermo Fisher Scientific
A recent collaborative study showed that approximately 450 polyclonal peptide antibodies out of 500 individual protein targets recognized their target by western blot analysis.
We utilize a proprietary multiple conjugation method where we conjugate peptides through both termini and through key internal sites. This methodology presents the peptides in alternate, multiple conformations, making them more antigenic and producing antibodies with greater utility across assays. Our conjugation scheme provides a better matching of epitopes between the presented peptide and the way the peptides are presented in the native protein.
We offer the following options for peptide conjugation to carrier proteins:
Many fusion vectors offer the convenience of either N-terminal or C-terminal epitope tags for purification and detection of the recombinant peptide. Epitope fusions may reduce the number of steps required to purify a recombinant protein, however these tags may also interfere with the structure and function of the recombinant peptide. The effect of epitope tags cannot be predicted as the folding of these peptide fusions cannot be predicted. In rare instances, epitope tags cannot be detected by common molecular detection methods due to interactions with the fusion polypeptide that mask the antigenic amino acids.
The Tag-On-Demand™ method uses adenoviral-based stop suppression technology to allow expression of an untagged (i.e. native) or C-terminally tagged recombinant protein of interest in mammalian cells from a single expression vector. Using a single clone, you can generate tagged protein for purposes of verifying expression and untagged protein for functionality. You may use one of the Tag-On-Demand™ Gateway® vectors or other compatible expression vectors available from Invitrogen.
If you wish to express your gene as a fusion to a C-terminal tag, you must clone in frame with the tag.
There are many important factors to consider when choosing a suitable part of a protein sequence for successful antibody production. The sequence, amino acid composition, and length of a peptide will influence whether correct assembly, purification, and subsequent solubilization are feasible.
The purity of a crude peptide typically decreases as the length increases. Purity >70% is sufficient for generating or testing antibodies. However, purities greater than 95% are often required for biological activity studies. Typically, peptides of 10-15 residues in length are used for raising antisera and the yield of peptide for sequences less than 15 residues is often sufficient.
Scale | Yield (Crude) | Yield (Purified) |
---|---|---|
20 | 20 mg | 10-12 mg |
50 | 50 mg | 20-25 mg |
100 | 100 mg | 50-51 mg |
Solubility is strongly influenced by composition. Peptides containing a large percentage of hydrophobic residues, such as Leu, Val, Ile, Met, Phe, and Trp, will often have limited solubility in aqueous solution and may be completely insoluble. To help ensure solubility, the hydrophobic amino acid content should be below 50% and there should be at least one charged residue (e.g., Asp, Glu, Lys, and Arg) for every five amino acids.
Cys, Met, or Trp residues are often problematic in synthesis because these residues are susceptible to oxidation and/or side reactions. If possible, choose sequences that contain a minimum of these residues. Alternatively, conservative replacements can be made for some residues.
Peptide solubility is dependent on the amino acid content of the peptide. Test a small amount of peptide for solubility in water, PBS, or various solvents prior to dissolving the entire peptide amount. For most peptides, solubilization in PBS or PBS-azide is used. Depending on the amino acid content, the use of mild acids or bases may be required (e.g., ammonia or acetic acid). If the peptide is not water soluble, employ one of the suggestions below:
Higher eukaryotes perform a variety of post-translational modifications, including methylation, sulfation, phosphorylation, lipid addition,and glycosylation. Such modifications may be of critical importance to the function of an expressed protein. Secreted proteins, membrane proteins, and proteins targeted to vesicles or certain intracellular organelles are likely to be glycosylated. The most common and best studied is N-linked glycosylation, where oligosaccharides are uniquely added to asparagine found in Asn-X-Ser/Thr recognition sequences in proteins. Another type of glycosylation is O-linked glycosylation, which involves either simple oligosaccharide chains or glycosaminoglycan chains (1). When expressing and purifying a glycosylated protein in a heterologous expression system, it may be desirable to quickly determine whether the protein is glycosylated properly. Protocols for carbohydrate analysis of proteins have been published to allow the molecular biologist to characterize glycosylated proteins of interest (2). The following sections discuss glycosylation patterns found in eukaryotic cells.
N-linked glycoproteins contain standard branched structures, which are composed of mannose (Man), galactose, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and neuramic acids. O-linked glycoproteins are composed of various number of sugars including galactose, N-acetylglucosamine, N-acetylgalactosamine, and neuramic acids.
The nature of N-linked glycosylation in insect cells (Sf21, Sf9, High Five™) is dependent on the protein expressed and the host cell line. N-linked glycosylation is generally of the high-mannose type. O-linked glycosylation is similar, although not identical, to mammalian cells, depending on localization and type of protein. Drosophila N-linked glycosylation is less complex in that it is not trimmed and sialylated. Thus Drosophila proteins have a high mannose content. Drosophila can also add O-linked glycosylation. Mimic™ Sf9 Insect Cells are modified Sf9 cells that stably express a variety of mammalian glycosyltransferases. These enzymes allow for production of biantennary, terminally sialylated N-glycans from insect cells. The cells can be used to produce more mammalian-like proteins in both baculovirus and stable insect expression systems.
S. cerevisiae N-linked glycoproteins contain only highly branched and extended high mannose structures (hyperglycosylation). S. cerevisiae O-linked glycoproteins are composed of less than four mannose residues. Pichia N-linked glycosylation consists mostly of short chain Man (3) GlcNAc residues and is closer to the typical mammalian high-mannose glycosylation pattern. Pichia O-linked oligosaccharides are present but are not major components of the total soluble glycoprotein of Pichia. Following you will find: an outline of the two basic types of N-linked glycosylation (1,2), a table of glycosylation inhibitors that can be used in vivo (2), and a table of enzymes which can be used to analyze carbohydrate structure on proteins. For further information about glycosylation in eukaryotes, see reference 4.
Type of inhibitor | Target enzyme | Effects on oligosaccharide structure | Effects on electrophoretic mobility in SDS-PAGE |
---|---|---|---|
Tunicamycin | GlcNAc transferase |
| Proteins migrate faster and show less heterogeneity |
Deoxynojirimycin Castanospermine | Glucosidase I and/or II |
| Dependent on processing Proteins appear to be a smaller size |
Deoxymannojirimycin | α-mannosidase I |
| Proteins appear to be a smaller size |
Swainsonine | α-mannosidase II |
| Dependent on the extent of processing |
Enzyme | Type of Enzyme | Specificity | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Endoglycosidase D | Endo | Cleaves various high mannose glycans | 7, 11 | |
Endoglycosidase F | Endo | Cleaves various high mannose glycans | 6, 3 | |
Endoglycosidase H | Endo | Cleaves various high mannose glycans | 12, 13 | |
β-galactosidase | Exo | Removes terminal galactosides from Gal-β1, 3-GlcNAc; Gal-β1,4-GlcNAc; Galβ1,3 GalNAc | 5, 8, 9 | |
Peptide:N-Glycosidase F | Endo | Glycoproteins between Asn and GlcNAc | 10 | |
Sialidases (Neuraminidases) | Exo | NeuAc-α2,6-Gal; NeuAc-α2,6-GlcNAc; or NeuAc-α2,3-Gal | 2 |
This table is adapted from Molecular Biology Labfax by T.A. Brown with permission from BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd