Search Thermo Fisher Scientific
Search Thermo Fisher Scientific
Possible cause(s) | Suggested solutions |
---|---|
Plasmid DNA, siRNA, or transfection reagent diluted in media containing serum or complexes formed in the presense of serum | Use serum-free medium for dillutions of plasmid DNA, siRNA, and transfection reagents. Note: we recommend using Opti-MEM® | Reduced Serum Medium (Cat. No. 31985-062) to dilute Lipofectamine® 2000 and DNA before complexing. |
DNA: transfection reagent ratio sub-optimal for cell line | Prepare complexes using a DNA (μg) to Lipofectamine® 2000 (μl) ratio of 1:2 to 1:3 for most cell lines. Optimization may be necessary. If so, vary DNA (μg): Lipofectamine® 2000 (μl) ratios from 1:0.5 to 1:5. If using a different transfection reagent, please consult the product manual. |
Dilution times or complexing incubation period was too short | For Lipofectamine® 2000, we recommend that the DNA and transfection reagent be diluted separately and incubated for five minutes. Add the diluted reagents together and incubate for 20 minutes for optimal performance. |
Not enough plasmid DNA used for dilution or complex formation | Verify concentration using a second method or check the DNA for degradation. Determine DNA concentration by performing A260/A280 readings on a spectrophotometer or by using the Quant-iT™ DNA Assays Kits (Q33130, Q33120). |
Plasmid DNA or siRNA used in transfection has degraded or is of poor quality | Ensure that the plasmid DNA or siRNA used for transfection is of high quality. For plasmid DNA purification kits, we recommend using our PureLink™ HiPure Nucleic Acid Purification Kits. |
Cell density was not optimal | Lipofectamine® 2000 works best in cultures that are >90% at the time of transfection. When working with lower cell densities (<70%), we recommend Optifect™ Transfection Reagent as an alternative. |
Complexes were added to cells in serum-free medium | Try using growth medium containing serum when performing transfections. Transfection performance is typically better when the cells are more viable. If you require serum-free conditions, test medium for compatibility with Lipofectamine® 2000 since some serum-free formulations (e.g. CD293, SFM II, VP-SFM) may inhibit cationic lipid-mediated transfection. |
Inhibitors were present in medium | Do not use antibiotics, EDTA, citrate, phosphate, RPMI, chondroitin sulfate, hyaluronic acid, dextran sulfate, or other sulfated proteoglycans in the growth medium or in the medium used to prepare DNA:transfection reagent complexes. |
Problems with assay used to measure efficiency or expression | Use a reporter gene to measure transfection efficiency. A reporter gene control allows you to confirm expression. |
Promoter-enhancer on vector is not recognized by the cell type | Verify that the promoter-enhancer on your vector construct is compatible with the target cell type. |
Cells have changed over time, or splitting conditions have changed | If transfection performance suddenly declines, it may be because of the cells. We recommend splitting and plating cells on a consistent schedule and in a manner where the cells are never too sparse or too dense. Excessive passaging also decreases transfection performance. If this is the case, start a new vial of cells from liquid nitrogen. |
Transfection reagent stored improperly | We recommend storing transfection reagents at 4°C. Freezing of transfection reagents, or storing them at room temperature, may decrease activity. |
Possible cause(s) | Suggested solutions |
---|---|
DNA: transfection reagent ratio sub-optimal for cell line | Prepare complexes using a DNA (μg) to Lipofectamine® 2000 (μl) ratio of 1:2to 1:3 for most cell lines. Optimization may be necessary. If so, vary DNA (μg): Lipofectamine® 2000 (μl) ratios from 1:0.5 to 1:5. |
Plasmid DNA preparation contains high levels of endotoxin | Ensure that the plasmid DNA or siRNA used for transfection is of high quality. For plasmid DNA purification kits, we recommend using our PureLink™ HiPureNucleic Acid Purification Kits. |
Cell density was not optimal | Lipofectamine® 2000 works best in cultures that are >90% at the time of transfection. When working with lower cell densities (<70%), we recommend Optifect™ Transfection Reagent as an alternative if cell viability is more important than expression levels. |
Complexes were added to cells in serum-free medium | Try using growth medium containing serum when performing transfections. Transfection performance is typically better when the cells are more viable. If you require serum-free conditions, test medium for compatibility with Lipofectamine® 2000 since some serum-free formulations (e.g. CD293, SFM II, VP-SFM) may inhibit cationic lipid-mediated transfection. |
Complexes not thoroughly mixed in growth medium | Following addition of transfection complexes into medium, ensure that the plate or wells are thoroughly mixed to prevent concentration of DNA:transfection reagent complexes in the wells |
Cells have changed over time, or splitting conditions have changed | If transfection performance suddenly declines, it may be because of the cells. We recommend splitting and plating cells on a consistent schedule and in a manner where the cells are never too sparse or too dense. Excessive passaging also decreases transfection performance. If this is the case, start a new vial of cells from liquid nitrogen. |
Antibacterial agents were used in growth medium during transfection | Do not use antibiotics such as chloroquine, penicillin, or streptomycin in growth medium because during transfection, cells are more permeable to antibiotics, which may cause toxicity. |
Transfection reagent stored improperly | We recommend storing transfection reagents at 4°C. Freezing of transfection reagents, or storing them at room temperature, may decrease activity. |
Cationic lipid reagent was oxidized | Do not vortex or agitate cationic lipid reagents excessively; this may form cationic lipid reagent peroxides. |
Selection antibiotic added too soon | When creating stable cell lines, allow at least 72 hr for cells to express the resistance gene before adding selective antibiotic. |
Possible cause(s) | Suggested solutions |
---|---|
Cells have changed over time, or splitting conditions have changed | If transfection performance suddenly declines, it may be because of the cells. We recommend splitting and plating cells on a consistent schedule and in a manner where the cells are never too sparse or too dense. Excessive passaging also decreases transfection performance. If this is the case, start a new vial of cells from liquid nitrogen. |
Transfections performed at different cell confluencies, or at different DNA:transfection reagent ratios | Transfection performance reproducibility is dependent on day-to-day consistency in cell splitting, plating and transfecting with a consistent protocol (same DNA:transfection reagent ratios). Different DNA preparations or media changes may also change transfection performance. |